Аналитика

In recent years, after the collapse of the USSR and the establishment of a unipolar world under the hegemony of the United States, the problem of terrorism has increased. It happened in the same states that was occupied by the United States of America and their allies. A special surge of terrorism is observed just after the US declared "war against international terrorism."
The experts of the Institute named after M.Kh. Watson (Brown University in Rhode Island) could not fail to pay attention on the consequences of the so-called US war against international terrorism.

This year marks exactly 30 years since the national movement began to show itself more actively in Georgia in 1988 - numerous informal organizations that sought to dismantle the socialist system, to tear the GSSR away from the USSR and to introduce Georgia into the structures of the Common Market and NATO.

One of the promotional booklets for the XXIII Winter Olympic Games to be held from 9 to 25 February 2018 in Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, reads: "The Olympic Games unite many countries, and people from all over the world are closely watching the sports opportunities of their compatriots."
However, speaking about the current Olympic Games, it would be more correct to use not the word "unite", but the word "separate".

The visit of the President of the Republic of South Ossetia Anatoly Bibilov to Moscow and the results of his talks with the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, the last steps of South Ossetia both within and outside the framework of this visit can be called, with good reason, a new level of development of the South Ossetian-Russian relations and South Ossetia as a whole.

At the moment, Russian-American relations are experiencing one of the most difficult periods in history. Washington calls Russia a key threat to security and a destabilizing factor in the Western world order. Moscow, on the other hand, views NATO expansion as a threat, a violation of strategic stability. The evidence of this is the deployment of the American anti-missile defense system in the territory of a number of states.

The processes of reconstruction and development, widely deployed in South Ossetia-a convincing marker of the republic's movement along the path of creation, its aspiration for a peaceful future. In contrast, official Tbilisi continues to be a prisoner of the 1990s, keeping the West's policy of revanchism towards South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Against the background of the general stabilization of the situation in the Caucasus, recently it has made itself felt the smoldering conflict around Nagorno- Karabakh. Despite the abundance of political actors that are involved in its settlement, only Russia is interested in the effectiveness of the efforts to establish long-term peace. This is explained not only by humanistic, but also by completely pragmatic considerations.

Assumptions about the impact of the events in Catalonia on the position of Europe towards South Ossetia are illusory, believes an expert of IA "Res" Inal Pliev.

In his opinion, the logic of block solidarity and frank double standards still prevail in the political elites of European countries, which do not allow them to recognize the political and legal basis of the independence of South Ossetia.

The genocide of the people of South Ossetia, carried out by the Menshevik government of the so-called Georgian Democratic Republic in 1920, was a logical continuation of the course taken by Georgia in the Middle Ages to destroy South Ossetia not only politically but also as geographically. It is significant that, on the one hand, the Georgian Bolsheviks led by Ordzhonikidze acted as provokers of the uprising, while on the other hand, Georgian Mensheviks led by Jordania were the executioners of South Ossetia, under the guise of pressure.

The position of the US administration towards Russia with the coming to power of Republican Donald Trump is not only softened, but has become tougher.